eLifeMagz.Com » An Update On JavaServer Faces With Oracle’s Ed Burns

Home > Business > An Update On JavaServer Faces With Oracle’s Ed Burns

An Update On JavaServer Faces With Oracle’s Ed Burns

December 15th, 2010 elifemagz Leave a comment Go to comments

A: Yes, for two reasons: first, since the new features introduced in JSF 2.0, and second, since the essential pattern choices in the initial architecture. My personal minimal objective with JSF 2.0 was to make sure that it was great sufficient to remonstrate people who had attempted JSF 1.2 and not favourite it to give it a second chance. Based on blogs, tweets, and first-person accounts, we regard we succeeded. Facelets is right away built in to the spec. we can quietly say that no other server-side Java horizon has as elementary and absolute Ajax formation as JSF 2.0. The combination part underline enables loyal UI condensation is to first time in the Java EE platform. These and other features make JSF a really convincing selection is to UI of abounding Internet applications.

Even even though user expectations have altered since JSF was first released, the essential challenges of office building a UI for a distributed focus sojourn the same. Specifically, all web apps must residence information conversion and validation, page flow, persistence, localization and internationalization, and UI plan and composition. JSF has been called a “kitchen penetrate framework”. This characterization is usually satisfactory when you ponder JSF in the context of the whole Java EE stack. It’s kinder to say that Java EE is a “full smoke-stack solution”. The JSF part of the Java EE full smoke-stack answer addresses all a must ponder when developing a web-based UI for a distributed application, with essential defaults for everything. JSF can fool around a utilitarian purpose even in “native” HTML5 applications that heavily precedence the customer information store, WebSockets, the Canvas and other features written to let the UI proof reside wholly in the browser. In this case, the information binding, conversion and validation portion of JSF may be used to facilitate the charge of integrating information from the customer in to the back end.

Q: What do you see as JSF’s competition?

A: We must be heed send from surreptitious competitors. UI technologies order in to two extended areas: desktop and mobile. Desktop is serve damaged down in to apps with an installer, and browser-based apps. Browser-based apps are damaged down in to apps that require a plugin (such as Flash or JavaFX) and those that do not. Here, JSF is a access in a swarming field. Other entries add Wicket, Vaadin, Spring MVC, Spring Web Flow, and Struts2.

While JSF is in send contest with these other technologies, it’s moreover in contest with entries in other areas.

Q: In a world of many not similar customer device types, where does JSF fit?

A: Client device sovereignty has been a part of JSF since day one. There are a few JSF part libraries that are written to let you writer JSF pages targeted at smartphones and other handheld devices. Oracle’s ADF Mobile product, from Fusion Middleware 11g, and Touchfaces, from Prime software, are two plain examples.

Q: What’s the standpoint for JSF in the forthcoming year?

A: We just ended JSF 2.1 and we’re right away drafting the JSR for JSF 2.2. This will be a full JSR, not a continuance release, that will capacitate us to do more. Some things we are deliberation add page actions, full HTML5 forms support, first category browser detection, and inclusion of JSR-276 metadata in the typical components.